Turn feedback into a roadmap

This is a design starter, not a verified live automation. The example output is illustrative. No provider run has been verified for this pack.

• Start with the included synthetic feedback or paste a small, redacted sample you are allowed to use.
• Live collection requires access to each selected source. A template does not automatically connect email, a CRM, or support tools.
• Ticket creation needs a supported connected destination and approval of the exact project and payload. Model and connector costs may apply.

Create a Product Plan for a feedback inbox. Sample feedback: two customers cannot find their invoices, one asks for dark mode, and three report invitation emails arriving late. Group related problems without counting duplicate reports as unique users. Propose an MVP, acceptance criteria, and a ranked roadmap with evidence and uncertainty. Draft tickets only; do not publish or send anything.

Three problem groups with source references, an invitation-delivery investigation first, an invoice-discovery improvement next, and dark mode retained for review. Counts in this example are synthetic, not customer analytics.

• Every priority links to its source evidence or is labeled a hypothesis
• Duplicate reports do not inflate unique-customer counts
• Reviewers can split and merge proposed groups
• A published ticket has a provider ID and destination receipt

Use the existing intake workflow for reviewed Jira issue creation after prioritizing the feedback. It is not an automatic multi-source feedback collector.

1. 1Review the Product Plan and replace the sample scope with your own requirements.
2. 2Inspect the connected Architecture starter. Ask Codelit to adapt it to your approved scope; these starters do not automatically synchronize edits.
3. 3Try one bounded task with your real inputs. Review connections, costs, permissions, and evidence before enabling recurring work or approving any external action.

Keep the existing evidence and resolve the specific blocker before retrying.

• If feedback has no source or identity evidence, mark frequency unknown instead of guessing unique customer counts.
• If a source is unavailable, keep the partial report and name the missing source. Do not treat missing feedback as zero demand.
• Review ticket receipts before retrying a failed or timed-out publication.

These are proposed measures, not claims about observed customer results.

• Time from feedback intake to reviewed decision
• Percentage of priorities with source evidence
• Reviewer correction rate for suggested groups